free-dynamic: anti-fem-anti-stupid: savypsychopath: anti-fem-anti-stupid: theresaunicornbehindu: ant
free-dynamic: anti-fem-anti-stupid: savypsychopath: anti-fem-anti-stupid: theresaunicornbehindu: anti-fem-anti-stupid: theresaunicornbehindu: anti-fem-anti-stupid: molly-hurst: anti-fem-anti-stupid: ace-pervert: dad-monster: anti-fem-anti-stupid: problematicparrot: davidwhitman: anti-fem-anti-stupid: friendly-neighborhood-patriarch: kweyolgoddess: rudecanadian: kweyolgoddess: ima-fuckingt4ble: leigh-daniel-sexbang: ima-fuckingt4ble: chocolatechipcunt: ima-fuckingt4ble: chocolatechipcunt: ima-fuckingt4ble: lunatrap: In the 21st century, where science is the norm, im amazed that circumcision is still a thing, such a barbaric pratice is still done to infant male babies, even before they can even open their eyes, let alone consent to getting their dicks mutilated, i dont know about you, but this should be assault, this is male genital mutilation, and female genital mutilation is illegal, another area where women have more rights than men, the right to genital integrity. I’m not circumcised, but my penis has a similar shape of a circumcised penis, and its painful, since i dont have the protection for my head, i hurt my head all the time, because i dont have the skin for protection, and if my dick gets hard enough, its painful. This is completely unnecessary, inmoral and there is no reason for it, if you are someone that supports genital mutilation, i wish you the worst, you have all my contempt. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ceht-3xu84I PLEASE DONT SUPPORT THIS I don’t even have a dick and looking at that hurt me I’m circumsised and you two have no idea good for you? not at all Elaborate I’m circumcised and honestly I don’t have any of the problems other circumcised people do. I’m glad for you, just like I’m glad for all the mutilated women who say they have no problems, it still shoudn’t be done. I’m sure I’d have no issues with my clit cut off but it doesn’t make it right. The clit and the foreskin aren’t the same thing. If they were cutting off the head of the penis then that’d make more sense. The foreskin would be more like the labia or clitoral hood (most likely the latter, as the forskin acts similarly). I know they’re not…. I’m just saying that even if I have something lobbed off doesn’t mean it’s ok If cutting a clit also provided minor medival benefits would it all be hunky dory? I know I’m supposed to look at this and be horrified and cry or something but it just doesn’t look that bad tbh. Makes me super uncomfortable. Plus all the talk of cutting of the head of the penis. *shudders* Watch the video. He shows pictures of circumcision procedures and a video. If you still think it’s fine after watching an actual infant genital mutilation procedure happen, there’s no helping you - you’re a heartless barbarian. I’ve seen videos of if. Trigger warning! Surgical procedures aren’t pleasant to look at. I’m so shocked that surgical procedures look scary and look like surgical procedures. Before I settled on math, I wanted to be a doctor. I’m just not squeamish. Watching surgery doesn’t bother me. That doesn’t make me a heartless barbarian. I’m a guy and it looks nothing more than your average surgery level of uncomfort Its cosmetic surgery done on a baby without anesthetic . Tell Anti-fem-anti-stupid its like giving a four year old a boob job! I understand that. It’s just false that it’s done with out any kind of anesthetic or that it’s as awful as people say it is. You can disagree with it on the basis of it being an optional surgery that has almost no risks (but why risk anything anyway right?). But pretending that it’s on par with chopping off a girls clit or other forms of genital mutilation is silly. Lying about it doesn’t help anyone. It doesn’t need to be as extensive as clitoridectomy to still be genital mutilation. Male circumcision is genital mutilation. It’s not technically mutilation. The penis is still fully functional. Cutting off the clit or something that actually changes whether or not the organ can function would be mutilation. It’s just an unnecessary modification. Just like trimming of the labia or clitoral hood is an unnecessary modification. If a fully grown man wants his foreskin by off then fine he can do it. But how can you support doing it to infants? I don’t support it or not support it. I don’t really car either way. It’s not really a big deal to me and I probably wouldn’t have my son circumcised. Is there any other cosmetic surgery that is ok to do to an infant?(Beyond removing moles and skin tags, which are not supposed to be on the skin and can cause discomfort) I don’t know? That’s for parents to decide. I don’t really care. When male genital mutilation is so normalized that people don’t think circumcision affects the penis’s functioning It doesn’t. It still works. Just be honest about what you’re against. There was a study done in Kenya consisting of 2,784 participants. 64.0% said that their penis was “much more sensitive” and 54.5% rated their ease of reaching orgasm as “much more.”http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3042320/#!po=0.537634 Another study in Uganda involving 4,456 uncircumcised adult men, 2,210 of whom got circumcised, showed no difference in sexual desire, erection issues, sexual function, sexual pleasure, and satisfaction. Other studies essentially showed similar results. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/all-about-sex/201510/does-circumcision-reduce-men-s-sexual-sensitivity The Queen’s University Sex Lab performed a study on sensitivity to both heat and pain on the penis. They found that it did not differ between circumcised and uncircumcised men. The article also explains where the idea of a circumcised penis being less sensitive comes from. In 2007, there was a study that measured how both responded to a Semmes Weinstein monofilament touch- test and found that it was the uncircumcised that responded more. However, the earlier study preferred the use of heat and pain due to it being more similar to a sexual sensation. (All of the studies and a survey that suggests women prefer circumcised men are provided in the article).https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/how-circumcision-affects-the-sensitivity-of-your-penis Circumcised men also have a reduced risk of HIV infection. http://healthland.time.com/2013/04/17/why-circumcision-lowers-risk-of-hiv/ Furthermore, circumcised men have a lower risk of penile cancer. The reason for this is not exactly clear but some have suggested that it’s because they can’t develop a condition called phimosis and they don’t accumulate smegma. http://m.cancer.org/cancer/penilecancer/detailedguide/penile-cancer-risk-factorshttp://www.hindawi.com/journals/au/2011/812368/ In contrast, uncircumcised men have a greater chance of contracting and passing on an infection. This is due to moisture being able to get trapped between the penis and the foreskin resulting in an ideal environment for bacteria growth. http://www.shape.com/lifestyle/sex-and-love/sex-circumcised-man-different Additionally, they have a greater chance of inflammation and may suffer from the inability to retract the foreskin and penile construction. http://m.newhealthadvisor.com/Circumcised-Vs-Uncircumcised.html Although I would like to say that I agree with the fact that forcibly removing the foreskin at such a young age is wrong. I personally believe that a person should be able to choose for themselves later on in life whether they want to go through a circumcision or not. *It should be noted that people can still express skepticism towards these studies because there is no definite answer. Some argue that by removing the foreskin’s touch-nerves it decreases sensitivity. Foreskin may also reduce friction and retain lubrication which can make it easier for them. Skeptic here, and i have a big problem with these studies, but first of all, let me give you credit for at least agreeing that this should not be performed on babies, this should not be a point that should be in question, if you see benefits, let your boy decide when he is 18Did you noticed almost all of these studies are done in Africa? why only Africa? yeah africa, im sorry, but Africa has very different standars that here, for example, im sure cutting the foreskin will prevent diseases, why? because africa has very low health standar, heck, they are struggling to have water to drink, let alone use it to wash their penisWant to prevent HIV? use a condom! Want to prevent tooth decays, gingivitis and therefore periodontitis, and almost all thooth problems? just remove all the theet of your kids!! im %100 sure this will prevent any futher complications, and if you do any culture test you will find the amount of bateria in the mouth will decrease!!But why not just wash their theeths? Shut up!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tL5repF3JFc&feature=youtu.behttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wIew1NFQSESome humor, why not?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCSWbTv3hng - FACT: Not so much. Globally, fewer than a third of all men are circumcised [World Health Organization, 2008].. And in the USA, fewer than half of all boys born in conventional hospitals from 2006-2009 were circumcised. Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/17/hea…- MYTH: Circumcision is recommended by doctors and medical associations- FACT: In 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics concluded that infant circumcision is not recommended as a routine procedure. The American Medical Association and the American Academy of Family Physicians agree. Source: “American Academy of Pediatrics: Circumcision Policy Statement”. Pediatrics 103 (3): 686–693. March 1999. doi:10.1542/peds.103.3.686. PMID 10049981.- MYTH: It’s just a bit of skin; he won’t miss it- FACT: The prepuce (foreskin) contains about 10,000 super-specialized nerve endings and a few feet of blood vessels. It’s important for sex, but it also protects the penis. Trust us, he’ll miss it.Source: “American Academy of Pediatrics: Circumcision Policy Statement”. Pediatrics 103 (3): 686–693. March 1999. doi:10.1542/peds.103.3.686. PMID 10049981.- MYTH: It’s easier to take care of a circumcised penis- FACT: All you have to do with a child’s intact penis is leave it alone. As the boy reaches puberty, he’ll be able to retract his foreskin and rinse it as necessary. Not a big deal.Source: http://www.circumstitions.com/Care.html- MYTH: Circumcision prevents urinary tract infections- FACT: The studies linking circumcision to lower risk of UTIs are flawed. Here are detailed studies: http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/U…- MYTH: Circumcision prevents penile cancer- FACT: In a letter to the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Cancer Society stated that it “does not consider routine circumcision to be a valid or effective measure to prevent [penile or cervical] cancers. …Penile cancer rates in countries which do not practice circumcision are lower than those found in the U.S.”Source: http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/PenileCa…- MYTH: Intact kids will get teased in the locker room- FACT: These days nearly 50% of boys nationwide are left intact - so the circumcised boys may be just as likely to get teased. Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/17/hea… Risks vs Rewards, and MGM is not worth it, even more when is done to a non consenting baby boyLets take into consideration, the fact, that this procedure, can be deadly, and constitutes a big part of neo natal deaths, and this is taking into consideration, some are not reported as by MGM, but are recorded as Hemorrhage or another reason, since MGM was the indirect reason117 death are because of MGM, while 44 are by suffocation, thats right! more die by MGM than being suffocated, i dont think, suffocated baby sounds very nice does it?Sources:http://www.cirp.org/library/death/http://www.circinfo.org/USA_deaths.htmlUPDATE i found that this link https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/how-circumcision-affects-the-sensitivity-of-your-penisIs one of many missleading head lines, it says, CDC endorses MGM, this is missleadinghttp://circwatch.org/cdc-circumcision-and-misleading-headlines/The only thing in question, is if GMG makes men feel less, well, i dont know, there are some sutdies that say no, and some yes , all i know its removing a vert eurogenous area, if this does not affect pleassure then i i dont know what willhttp://www.menshealth.com/sex-women/circumcision-pros-and-consthe arguement i most hate is “i did it to my boy because women like it”yes, lets do more for women, even cut our dicks, the west society is not gynocentric enough already, why not force boobs implants on girls because men like it -- source link
#egalitarianism#mens rights