realtransfacts: libragender: realtransfacts: noodles-07: realtransfacts: Some definitions Do y
realtransfacts:libragender:realtransfacts:noodles-07:realtransfacts:Some definitions Do you think I make more posts like this?Aren’t libramasuline and librafeminie known as demiboy and demigirl now?As far as I know, demiboy/girl doesn’t have to mean that the person is part agender anymore? I’ve seen several demigirls/demiboys who don’t include agender in their definitions of themselves - they just use them to mean “part boy/girl and part something else”, not necessarily agender. Although I know that was part of the original definitions of demigirl/boy, so there definitely is an overlap between those labels and librafem/masc.Maybe libramasc/fem is used more by those who want to emphasize their agenderness?An agender demigender person can use the libragender label, but in general the “partially something else” part of the demigender definition doesn’t necessarily mean agender, so not all demigender people would be libragender. Also, not all libragender people’s experience is being agender and partially another gender. Some reasons an agender person might use the libragender label include being (fe)male-aligned, femininity/masculinity being an important part of their gender expression or internal sense of gender, and relating to (wo)manhood/(fe)maleness in the way they experience attraction (e.g. an agender person who views their attraction to women as gay may ID as librafeminine). So, not all libragender people would be demigender, either. Hope this helps clear things up! Thank you so much! -- source link
#so boom