smallblueangel: skeleton-lad: fitotrd: skeleton-lad: fitotrd: skeleton-lad: fitotrd: jetpack-jenny:
smallblueangel:skeleton-lad:fitotrd:skeleton-lad:fitotrd:skeleton-lad:fitotrd:jetpack-jenny:friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:satanic-anti-feminist:conservativeveteranpatriot:tired-bi-lady:clementmoraschi:logicd:the-benaissance-man:gavelbanginsara:zomanian:spankmethorin:radgreymon:rudegirlqueer:sarcasticxfantastic:socialismartnature:Rape, By The Numbers.everyone needs to see this graphicBoost.crazyI linked this to my guy friends who always use the excuse of “What about the false reports? It’s not fair that innocent men are accused of a crime they didn’t commit”2 out of 1000. 0.02% Of all rapes are false.YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW MAD I AM RIGHT NOW.That math is wrong. 2/1000=0.2%This whole thing is wrong. The “falsely accused” should be in the “reported” category”, as it is a subset. Of the “reported but not accused”, and “faced trial but not jailed”, at least some of those should also be included in the “falsely accused” group. This is like the recent problem in my stats class, where 200 adults were surveyed, and 110 drank coffee, 50 drank tea, and 90 drank cola. The key is that there’s overlap in the groups, and this chart doesn’t represent that. Claiming that huge number as the number of rapists is purely speculation. If only so many are reported, then what supports the claim that there are something like eight times that number that actually happen? The overall design of the chart is bad. Since the category represented uses two units, and all other categories are divisible by two, it visually inflates the numbers, where a more accurate representation would show smaller groups. Not factually wrong, but it plays off people’s perceptions, and show that the purpose of this is emotional influence rather than objective reporting. http://i.imgur.com/6JNyYOl.jpgAlso, though the debunking states the false claims to be from 2-8%, there are a lot of studies showing it to be anywhere from 2-28%>378,000 notesleave it to tumblr to spread false bullshit while actual factual posts get little to no notes^thatSpread this shit. Over 500,000 and most people are reblogging the wrong informationReblogging for truth.or if you’re too lazy to read it, here’s a video that explains it:YesFucking retardsIf you saw this OP and didn’t immediately say “says who” then let me speak in your language.BAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, BAHHHHH BAH ABH BAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH@lala-chapien Oops.Jesus bro why would link that mammal knowing I would click it… I’m sorry.Its ok I still love yaThank you. :]How does anyone know how many are unreported?No one truly does; that’s why estimates vary so widely—even from methodologies thought of as solid. The information by its nature is inherently difficult (if not impossible) to gather. -- source link