mother-child-life: hastobealock: takineko: hastobealock: takineko: hastobealock: takineko: hastobeal
mother-child-life: hastobealock: takineko: hastobealock: takineko: hastobealock: takineko: hastobealock: takineko: hastobealock: takineko: hastobealock: takineko: voicefortheunborn: mother-child-life: Found this little gem on Facebook. Other than the blatant disrespect of our development and all the lovely dehumanization, this is chalk full of down-right lies. Apparently this is an extremely magnified photo of a 5 week old embryo. This is what the creator of this image says is the true ‘face’ of abortion. This makes no sense though, this is not the after math of an abortion this is what the unborn looks like before an abortion, before they can be torn to pieces and separated from their mother and thrown away like garbage. Also, notice how they put the word face in quotes, applying that if a humans face doesn’t look like the “typical” or “normal” face, it’s not really a face. This is just an underdeveloped face, that’s all. One day this growing, developing person might have bright blue eyes, or maybe deep shades of brown, a button nose, or a slender nose, perhaps thin shapely lips, or pouty lips, who knows? We all looked like this at one point though, everyone you’ve ever loved, admired, shared laughs with, hugged, and smiled at looked just like this at one point in their life. So, yes, I find this extremely insulting. The person who made this says that pro-life people think once a women gets pregnant she should “lose her rights as a citizen and as an autonomous human being”. This is obviously a huge load of crap. Nobody loses rights once they become pregnant and an unborn baby doesn’t “gain” more rights, they receive equal rights for being a human being, just like their mother. Since this photo tries so hard to dehumanize a 5 week old embryo let’s learn some fun facts about their development, you know, all the interesting stuff about them! At 5 weeks arm buds and feet are forming, with webbing in-between the toes and fingers, within a week they’ll begin to move them. A 5 week old embryos heart is beating twice as fast as its mother, the heart is beginning to divide into 2 chambers. Their tongue and vocal chords are already beginning to form. See, as a person who values human life at every stage, from conception to death, it doesn’t matter what someone looks like. You could be missing both eyes, your nose, your mouth, teeth, tongue, ears, etc and I’d still defend your right to life. There’s something wrong with your movement when you have to use such dehumanizing language to justify it. Every time someone has used dehumanization to justify the killing of human life they’ve been on the wrong side of history. Most women find out their pregnant at 5 weeks and don’t get abortions until 6-8 weeks earliest ! This is a 7 week old fetus which looks strikingly more “human” but they wouldn’t want to show that! They want you to believe that your getting rid of a clump of cells instead of a real living being that has its own blood type, beating heart and closed circulatory system. In his/her DNA hair color, eye color, gender, blood type, and most personality traits are determined at the very moment of conception. They avoid actual scientific debate for emotional biased bs. And God forbid you want to support women and give them other options beside abortion. Ableism at it’s worst. Oh did you get disfigured in a horrific event? Were you born disfigured? Guess you’re less human than others. ???? Yeah, that’s not what the OP was saying at ALL. Not even a good try. It’s an under developed human baby. The article attempts to devalue it’s like by showing you how unhumanlike it looks at this early stage. Imagine if we did that to anyone who looked less than human on the surface. It is still a fetus inside someone else’s body & they have a right to remove said fetus if they so choose. And that’s not ‘devaluation’, that’s MY bodily autonomy, something YOU obviously don’t care that we, as already born humans, have. Underdeveloped FETUS(which is a perfectly accepted medical term for what that in the pic is). Knock it off with the emotional manipulation, will you? That’s all this entire post was. Ugh. Yes a fetus does need it’s mother to survive. It also deserves bodily autonomy and it is it’s own person too. Guess you forgot to look up bodily autonomy. Yes. I believe the mother has to waive that right in the face of becoming pregnant because the childs right to live is more important. Wow. Wow. The fact that you ACTUALLY FUCKING SAID IT. Pro-life, my fucking ass. You can stop replying to me now. It’s not killing the woman. So? In some cases it does, and in ALL cases it’s none of your business. Someone killing their child is none of my business. Maybe. I’d still like to pass legislation to make that illegal. You can stop replying now.Pro-‘life’, my ass. I’m just going to chime in here and add that parents have a moral and ethical responsibility to care for their children until someone else can, even if they don’t want to. It is a fact that when you become a parent you must do things that you don’t necessarily want to do in order to care for your children - when my son was an infant and I had to breastfeed him every 2 hrs I didn’t always feel like it, I sometimes dreaded it but I did it anyway because not doing it was child neglect. That’s just one example of how parents use their bodies to care for their children when they don’t want to. I feel like im a broken record when I say this but pregnancy is a result of natural biology, not some punishment prolifers came up with! If you want to avoid pregnancy USE PROTECTION! Take some self responsibility instead of blaming the fetus you created. -- source link