meatsuit:thebibliosphere:elfwreck:olderthannetfic: kimberlyeab:athingofvikings:olderthannetfic:lanni

meatsuit:thebibliosphere:elfwreck:olderthannetfic: kimberlyeab:athingofvikings:olderthannetfic:lanninglurksnomore:olderthannetfic:*cackling*If OTW weren’t around, this wouldn’t be “scaremongering”: It would be the inescapable status quo. The people who believe this crap are the anti-vaxxers of fandom. Oh god. They kind of are, aren’t they? I’d go bigger and just say that they’re the conservatives/reactionaries of fandom–or, to frame it differently, this is how conservative and authoritarian ideologies express themselves in the context of Fandom. my opinion on AO3 is that it’s an important asset but i still find it scummy that they’ll ask for money but when their users try to ask for money they slam them with their non-monetization rules.Like Anne Rice is dead and this isn’t the 90s anymore, people are making money from fandom please catch up with the times. I think you’ve misunderstood:AO3 was built by a bunch of us with our free donated labor for the purpose of being a space free from commercial spam.It’s not a public service. It was built by us to house the type of fandom culture we liked.People who want to do fandom differently, including making money, are welcome to go build their own site with their own money or their own donated labor. AO3 does not forbid commercial links because they think fans making money from fanworks is immoral but them making money (to run the damn site) is fine.AO3 forbids commercial links because they are making a very specific claim about the legality of fanworks, and that claim is about noncommercial fanworks.They’re not saying that commercialized fanworks are against the law. They’re just not prepared to host them–nor defend them in court.In case people missed it: The OTW will not honor DMCA takedown orders that are basically, “I own X work and that’s a fanfic of it, and that’s copyright infringement so make it go away.” The OTW says, lolnope, we don’t think that’s copyright infringement. If you disagree, sue us.The OTW says: Disney - we will not remove explicit Mandalorian fanfic. Rowling, Warner Bros - we will not remove trans Harry Potter fanfic. Gabaldon - we are not removing Outlander fanfic no matter how much you think it’s illegal or a personal violation. Yarbro, if someone puts “The Adventure of the Gentleman in Black” on AO3, you will need to actually take it to trial to (try to) get it removed; none of this C&D order followed by fans caving because they can’t afford a lawyer.…So far, nobody has sued them. (This is, in my mind, the strongest proof we have that fanfic is not copyright infringement. In 13 years, not a single person or company has scrounged up a lawyer and filed a lawsuit against AO3/the OTW for hosting fanworks.)But they’re not willing to put themselves on the line for commercial works. Those get considered differently in copyright law. They’re not always infringing - there’s a whole history of parody books & songs to prove that - but the OTW is not dealing with them.The OTW does not care if fans are making money. The OTW cares if fans making money interfere with its legal defense of its archive. If you are not a copyright lawyer, your opinion about the situation is not going to be considered. Also, it wasn’t just Anne Rice coming after fandom in the 90s as though this is some relic holdover terror from ancient history.Events like Strikethrough and Boldthrough happened in the early to mid-2000s. It felt like you’d wake up every day in 2007 and find another fandom group on LJ gone. (And not just fandom groups either, important community groups for education and trauma survival were also wiped out in those purges as well.)And while not exactly the same, Yahoo Groups–and yes Yahoo Groups was a major online fandom hub at one point–were deleted as late as 2019 with very little warning, leaving a lot of older fandom groups scrambling to back up decades worth of content.I might be projecting, but Fanfic.net seems to be wobbling too. It wouldn’t surprise me to find out they go under in the next few years despite performing similar purges of adult content in 2012 and allowing for obnoxious ads, which made the site unusable on mobile unless you wanted to see an ad what felt like every couple of paragraphs. (It might be better now, I haven’t checked in a while.)It has only been in very recent memory that fandom has gained any sort of foothold that isn’t poised directly over a precarious faultline that could at any moment open up and swallow entire communities whole, and a huge part of that is the volunteers at Ao3 who decided to play chicken with the likes of Anne Rice and won.Ao3 at its core was and is built by fandom. Some people don’t like it and that’s fine, but to even suggest that the volunteers are lounging around eating peeled grapes and lighting cigars with hundred dollar bills making bank through fraud while fanfic authors are left out in the cold is beyond the scope of laughable. To me this is yet another example of people being weird about non-profits. People tend to forget that just because a non-profit is not there to make money, it still needs a lot of money to operate. You are paying for a service when you donate to a non-profit, just like when you purchase a service from a for-profit, but for some reason because it’s a public good of some kind people are so paranoid about “where their money is going” to a degree that for-profits don’t get, even though non-profits have a much higher degree of transparency. OTW has 990s and audited financial statements available to the public. You can look at those whenever you want.OTW needs robust servers, fairly compensated staff, reserve funds for emergencies and growth opportunities, etc. That’s millions of dollars. But because it’s a charitable donation all of a sudden people think “what could it possibly cost, 5 dollars?” They want non-profits to produce the cheapest output possible, not the most effective. They also don’t want their money to go toward staff compensation, as if they want non-profit workers to labor for pennies, for the “love of the cause.” It’s nonsense. -- source link

More pics about