the-fucking-facts:the-fucking-facts.tumblr.com/post/80330262178/hey-my-english-teacher-ment
the-fucking-facts: http://the-fucking-facts.tumblr.com/post/80330262178/hey-my-english-teacher-mentioned-a-statistic-in-classIn other words you’re very very wrong. That post is not even good. Check out RAIIN. Read the CDC study on pages 11-12. There are other sexual assault/rape surveys out there. The DOJ study is interesting, I am wondering how their numbers are different from other surveys. The part about their way of gathering the info for the statistics is the most interesting, with this tidbit about info gathering (page 2): Persons are interviewed every 6 months over 3 years with the first interview conducted in personand follow-up interviews conducted either in person or byphone. vs with the CDC states it was a one time phone interview, page 9. Honestly, the DOJ method of gathering info is so much more invasive; less people are willing to discuss such intimate and horrendous details of a violent crime with someone in person and then over the phone for 3 years. If someone changed a phone number or moves and the survey people loose contact their info will not be recorded. If someone decided to drop out of the survey because discussing such a traumatic event for 6 times over 3 years is awful their info will not be recorded. I have my own severe emotional triggers - I honestly don’t know if I was asked to participate in a survey over 3 years I could do it. Invasive surveys like this make people who are still sensitive about the situation less likely to respond. TL;DR: Different surveys have different numbers, yes, but let us analyze the method of recording info vs blindly looking at a study. -- source link
#dude bro#fedora