1cise4all:aubernstallion:thought-audit: Nobody better take this blog *too* seriously.Of course,
1cise4all: aubernstallion: thought-audit: Nobody better take this blog *too* seriously.Of course, nonconsentual surgery/partial amputation is unethical. That much doesn’t take a PhD to figure out. Be it the penis or a toe or an ear.But cut men can experience equal depths of connection, love, and pleasure as anyone else. There is no true physical cap on joy that a person can endure. And we are all intact on the inside.Questioning circumcision undermines the very foundation of our culturally-ascribed sense of masculinity. Coupled with the complex power dynamics it creates–its fertile territory for such S&M play as is described herein.So, don’t take this blog too seriously. Take it just seriously enough.Much love! Another example of the hypocrisy and blatant denial in the “intactivist” community…. Sorry, but “Of course, nonconsentual surgery/partial amputation is unethical” is debatable, unless of course you’d also advocate for letting a child perish when it required immediate intervention. And no, saying that circumcision is unnecessary in comparison is not a counterargument. Clearly, nonconsentual surgery on infants or adults, namely infants, is not inherently unethical or immoral. Calling it unethical is an uneducated, ignorant assumption. Part of the reason people may take your blog “too seriously” is because you take yourself too seriously, and absolutely refuse to entertain viewpoints contrary to yours, or accept them as credible.It doesn’t take a private discussion to learn that, but I most certainly did the hard way. You’re condescending, disrespectful, and have no regard for logic that challenges yours. You sooner accuse people have having various mental illnesses than consider the weight of their rationale. And yes, I’ll be posting screenshots soon. …That, and every single one of your posts directly berates, disrespects, insults, and shames circumcised men in a way that your portray as “truth” It’s no different from a racist calling blacks “niggers” and claiming to impart factual information, or truth. You also inspire conflict between men who aren’t circumcised and men who are. Your sadistic game is only adding to the divide. Ever seen the arguments / animosity people have online, everywhere, on all social media platforms over this topic, namely men who were affected by the practice, and men who weren’t? Probably not, considering you made it extremely clear in out ‘talk’ that you’ve actually done very little research on this topic, like most “intactivists”, but it’s because they deal with stigmas people like you create.It does not take a PhD or even a GED to discern that your blog is filled to the brim with hatred, and that so too is the entire “intactivist” (a.k.a. emotional terrorists, mental rapists, etc) community for its many, countless, similar discrepancies.“Much love” doesn’t change the words you commit to. Endearing can coexist with malevolent. You might as well insult every minority and then sign off by telling people you “love them”. Disturbing and unfortunate. I totally agree.Hypocrites like intactivists are probably the last people to decide what’s ethical and what’s not. Ethics should not be weaponized against peoples well-being. The whole idea of making people ‘believe’ circumcision is harmful by spreading fake-news and shaming circumcised men, just so they can rely on them later, is probably more unethical then circumcision ever could be.There are enough circumcised men who fall for their psyops and don’t do further debunking research on the topic, which then think they got ‘harmed’, even though they’re better off than most.Intactivists then joyfully use the resulting anger for their cause. The problem is that thinking they got ‘harmed’ is the factor that’s troubling people, and this thinking is independent of actual harm.The whole intactivist movement is nothing but crude bullying made possible by the internet. Before then, parents happily granted their sons a circumcision when provided by healthcare and no one considered it as harmful. There should be way more people opposing and protesting intactivism, and the best way to do so is proper enlightenment. Circumcision isn’t just a domination of the body–it’s a psychological attack on people who don;t want to believe their parents, or society would ever have done such a thing to them.People who cannot face their violation champ at the bit for any excuse to make sure the next generation is equally traumatized. -- source link