postmodernmulticoloredcloak:winterofthedarkestlight:postmodernmulticoloredcloak:winterofthedarkestli
postmodernmulticoloredcloak:winterofthedarkestlight:postmodernmulticoloredcloak:winterofthedarkestlight:postmodernmulticoloredcloak:dailybuckybarnes:He looked right at me and he didn’t even know me.When you realize that ‘on the bridge’ is ambiguous because he went against Steve on a street bridge but he just had a flashback of the train bridge with Steve trying to reach to himI’m not the only one who thought that the bridge thing could be ambiguous right??Lol, probably not, but for some reason I always interpreted that scene as referring to the bridge in TWS. It’s dumb in retrospect, as he literally has a flashback to the train bridge a minute earlier, but for some reason the dots didn’t connect. I mean since I’m assuming this scene at least was written by a person with a brain (at this point who knows, but I think we can assume a brain was involved in writing at least this scene) it could be an intentional text vs subtext thing… text being ‘who is the guy from before’ subtext being the fact that the line can be interpreted as ambiguous because he doesn’t specify which bridge and in fact while a bridge was involved in the recent fight, there’s plenty of other ways he could have referred to the man he fought. The man from before. The man from the fight. The man with the shield. But he denotes him using the element of “bridge”. Which has a history. A history he just grasped in his mind. So… -- source link