lovepeaceohana:quendergeer:generic-nerd-blog:littlemissmutant:odysseiarex:reginalds:…having Hamlet a
lovepeaceohana:quendergeer:generic-nerd-blog:littlemissmutant:odysseiarex:reginalds:…having Hamlet and the Ghost communicating in sign language—one might describe it almost as their “private” language—also served to produce the (in my experience, unique) effect of putting the father-and-son pair in a sort of psycho-spiritual bubble, contra mundum; a bubble that excluded all others and highlighted Hamlet’s isolation. The relationship between father and son portrayed in most productions comes across as distant, severe and (on Hamlet’s part) rather worshipful, even awestruck. In this production the father/son relationship is portrayed as having been loving and paternally intimate, which makes Hamlet’s reaction to his father’s tale of murder all the more harrowing. [x] [x]#but the only thing is you’d have to know the play first #which seems a little exclusionary #good reasoning thoughif i recall correctly, hamlet spoke the ghost’s lines aloud to the audience (you can see his mouth moving in the 3rd gif there). the other time the ghost appears, the closet scene, hamlet didn’t translate but the ghost’s message was conveyed through emotion just as well. there was also a nice moment in the same scene where hamlet tried to speak to his mother through signing — the private language of their family unit — and she refused to recognize it.the actor playing hamlet’s father is deaf, and has been working with the oregon shakespeare festival for several years now, signing in all his roles. obviously i haven’t seen everything he’s been in, but from what i have seen i can tell you that through a combination of body language and actors translating, the meaning is clear even without spoken language.edit: the actor’s name is howie seagoI saw Howie Seago at Ashland and he was terrific, some lines are spoken by the scene partner as in this gifset, and others are left un-interpreted if the meaning is fairly clear or can be extrapolated from context.I love the idea of Gertrude refusing to sign as an indicator that she is totally over the idea of her + Hamlet Sr. + Hamlet Jr. as a family unit.My favorite thing that Seago’s done that Ive seen (though I’m sad I missed Hamlet now) was prolly Richard III. He was Hastings, and his mistress was his translator. This meant that his monologues were instead conversations with his closest confidante, who was a woman of color. They also staged his execution so that his last lines were curses delivered as they were dragged off to be killed. She was taken first, however, so he was left signing to a large group of people who had neither the capability nor interest in hearing what he had to say.having hamlet speak the lines maintains (in a gloriously economical way) the possibility that his father’s ghost and his accusations might all be in his head, which is a key ambiguity that most stage productions really struggle to maintainI don’t usually reblog shakespeare but this is worth reblogging for the commentaryOh jesus, mentally unstable Hamlet latching onto what little bit of familial identity he has left, jesus christ kill me now.Also to note: while the King is obvs powerful, his son who has a voice is another kind of Legacy in this adaptation. Hamlet can finally give voice to the kinds of wrongs the king has socially, politically, and literally been mute about. -- source link