draikinator:essayofthoughts:indigoumbrella:essayofthoughts:indigoumbrella:huffpostarts:In The Not So
draikinator:essayofthoughts:indigoumbrella:essayofthoughts:indigoumbrella:huffpostarts:In The Not So Distant Future, Glow-In-The-Dark Trees Could Replace Street LightsIs that… is that even healthy?There are sea organisms and fungi which glow in the dark and there’s fireflies and jellyfish which glow in the dark. It doesn’t do them any harm nor does it do the people around them any harm. I would say its pretty healthy, as well as it would mean more photosynthesis happening in cities which mean cleaner air.I was just curious about how they were doing it and for some reason I didn’t think to click the link. But thanks! It makes more sense now. I was afraid it was some kind of chemical thing.nah just genetic modification using existing bioluminescent genes. Genetics is really cool, and so is bioluminescence. I mean they’ve already made pigs glow using jellyfish genes and pigs are waaay more complicated than trees iirc. So they’re actually (i think) less likely to muck it up with trees.In which caseGLOWYFORESTSGLOWYTREESGLOWYEVERYTHING(I like glowy things)means more trees which is gooduses less electricity which is good (for both tax reasons and also just because reasons)pretties everything upjust generally all good stuffglowy trees 2k15 plz -- source link