takemi-bae:themostbeomanintheworld:ace-pervert:friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:astridwanderlust:midn
takemi-bae:themostbeomanintheworld:ace-pervert:friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:astridwanderlust:midnight-spectrum-again:spare-shoes:Yeah so the Big Think is literally owned by big oil. They’re making shit up so people feel too exhausted to fight for any change. Ignore this kind of environmental nihilism, all it does it help the rich avoid change.The fuckbut EXPERTZ SEZ, guise!You don’t wanna be gainst XPERTZ, do ya?Experts can be bought and sold cheaply“the emissions generated by watching 30 minutes of netflix”Okay so not to distract or disagree with the main content of this post, but the last question in the thread here is a point of confusion I have frequently seen in the past 15-20 years, particularly within discussions of electric cars. Electrical use causes emissions? WUT. Like, gaseous and particulate emissions? Yes, electricity does produce emissions. It’s just that you don’t typically see them—not at the end-of-line, consumer-level use.Any device you run in your home, and any car that recharges from the grid, shares in whatever is running that grid—in the United States, about 63% fossil fuels (down from 70+% about 15 years ago, which at that time was mostly coal). Even single-use batteries are not exempt from this, as it takes energy at various material handling levels to make batteries. As a rule, batteries do not make energy. They make energy portable.@takemi-bae -- source link