The 5:2:3 Ratio Female Figure - A  New Constant? - by Muse MintHaving sponsored the SlimUltraBusty t

The 5:2:3 Ratio Female Figure - A  New Constant? - by Muse MintHaving sponsored the SlimUltraBusty thread on BEArchive for quite a while and being a woman who is busty and wants to be bustier, I have noticed that the imaginations of those who post there tend to like quite an exaggerated size for bosoms, which it great…!  But I think it is counter-productive in moving ahead the more important agenda of making larger bosoms more in the norm of the female figure, or at least a good percentage of women wanting to have a larger bust.During the past decades, the beauty contests have all but engraved in stone the 3:2:3 ratio of what is considered the “perfect” female figure, that is 36-24-36 has reigned supreme as a constant for too long a time, in my opinion.  As we have all seen and experienced in our surfing the web, there has arisen a more “bimbofied” type of figure that accentuates a larger bosom and we have seen many models who have enhanced their bosoms to larger and larger sizes to enthusiatic audiences both male and female, but alas, they are still looked on as abberations and not paragons of beauty to the general public.But, one side effect of seeing larger bosoms on the web is the abundance of women with larger breasts that are willing to show off their naturally larger bosoms and be proud of what they have.  There is less shaming of women with extra large breasts and more acceptance for them having what has been hidden from public view for an historically long time.  Unfortuantely, the medical community still wants women with extra large breasts to be shamed so they can make money doing scarring breast reduction surgeries, which is a travesty and criminal in my opinion.  Mother Nature blesses women with beautiful breasts of many sizes, some of which are many times larger than the largest of breast augmentations available.  To me, these extraordinarily well-endowed women are part of the genome of the female persona and taking that larger context into account, deserve to be adored and cherished, not shamed and humiliated.  Instead of revealing these special females as something to be “fixed and normalized” by medical quacks, they should be cared for and supported and admired for their special assets at the top of the possible female form.My comments here are introductory and open to discussion, of course, but what I would like to see more than fanatcizing about enormous bosoms and fantastical female creatures dragging around breasts that require a cart to carry them is more of a push to reset the 36-24-36 ratio to a higher scale.  A 4:2:3 ratio would be 48-24-36 and a 5:2:3 ratio would be 60-24-36.  I like the 5:2:3 ratio because the lower two figures added togehter create the top figure…2+3=5, which has a mathametical sense, in my opinion.I have put together a panel above of images that portray the 5:2:3 ratio.  The first four women are modified by morphing, but the fifth is of Beshine who is a real person.  Veiwed altogether, I think that these women all show us how the 5:2:3 ratio is extremely attractive, desireable, and sensual and should be considered as the new optimum and constant for measuring female beauty.  Of course, there are females who exceed this ratio in real life and I want them to be adored and praised, but it is high time that we break away from smaller breasts of the 3:2:3 ratio and embrace a top heavier ideal which both men and women want.MuseI could use more sponsors on my Patreon.  Only $2 a month.  Here is a link: https://www.patreon.com/MuseMint?fan_landing=trueThanks for your support! -- source link
Tumblr Blog : musemintmadness.tumblr.com

More pics about