shadowsasquatch:This shows a good example of how bigfoot structure isn’t equal to a human&rs
shadowsasquatch: This shows a good example of how bigfoot structure isn’t equal to a human’s structure. If you understand body ratios, it can be really easy to bust a hoax suit picture. And this is why Patty is still debated to this very day. She has non-human body ratios. All humans have a specific body ratio we fit into. Our arms are 20% shorter than our legs. Bigfoot, on the other hand, their arms are 5% shorter than their legs. It’s a pretty significant difference that gets overlooked. So many people have come out and claimed they were the ones in the Patty suit, but everyone who tries to replicate the pose can’t nail Patty’s picture on point to prove it. Everyone in a human suit can’t match the bigfoot ratios. No one yet has ever been able to do so because our human ratios still show in the monkey suits. Look at her arm, it extends past her butt both in the length of the arm and the distance from the rear end and wrist. That is a LONG arm. It’s beyond what a human can have naturally. Now compare the distances of the wrist to the elbows in both examples. Patty’s is a very long length again. This video by ThinkerThunker goes more in depth on human vs bigfoot ratios. -- source link