luidilovins:acquiredalias:itistimetodisappear:antipornfeminist:whatthefuuuuuuccckkkk:monsterousbee:v
luidilovins:acquiredalias:itistimetodisappear:antipornfeminist:whatthefuuuuuuccckkkk:monsterousbee:virginiaisforhaters:maaarine:“15 Men React To The Idea Of Taking Their Wife’s Last Name After Marriage”Men believe the family is their domain but when it comes to watching the children or doing chores suddenly it’s not their responsibility Men believe the family is their property. Male lineage is a scamI clicked on the link because I expected the other answers to be less bad but they aren’t Asdfgdgjfflhkjl if we were to look at this ‘biologically’, men would be the ones taking the women’s surname hands down. See, children get all of there mtDNA (mitochondrial dna) from their mother and none from their father - where as their normal DNA is a 50:50 mix of both their mother’s and father’s. This means that mtDNA remains unchanged as its passed down from mum to daughter. This goes on for generations, in fact, geneologists can trace back lineages for millions of years using mtDNA.However, the father’s dna is diluted with every generation, and soon becomes unrecognizable. The mother’s biologically legacy lasts the longest and that’s the teaReblogging for the last comment. My sister works in genealogy, identifying any female living relatives of missing soldiers. The men dont matter. Why? Because the female family member’s DNA can be traced back GENERATIONS with no decay. When bodies (generally from vietnam or Korean wars) are recovered, they then can finding living female biological relatives, no matter how distantly related, to positively identify the remains. Post reminded me.of this tweet -- source link