classicalsissyism: 1. Might makes right. The strongest system of ethics, i.e. the system with the mo
classicalsissyism: 1. Might makes right. The strongest system of ethics, i.e. the system with the most strength behind it in human terms, will win. Any system in which the weak are supposed to dominate the strong is fundamentally flawed, because the weak are not capable of ruling over the strong. 2. Masculinity is materially defined, not spiritually defined. A given person’s masculinity is best determined by a combination of a measure of that person’s free testosterone as well as their muscle-building genetic profile, plus personality. 3. The masculine is, with respect to the right of rule, superior to the feminine. This holds both between men and women, as well as between men and men and between women and women. The more masculine rules over the less, by virtue of greater strength. 4. The feminine exists to serve the masculine, in whatever way the latter deems appropriate, and feminine virtue consists in carrying out this service obediently. 5. Feminine men – defined as men who not only exhibit less masculinity (as defined in point 2) but also exhibit a feminine, subservient personality – are both best served and can best serve society as transgender women. Such men are bound by their nature not to pursue a false masculinity, which for them represents an ethical dead end, but rather to pursue the most feminine life they can live. Modern technology in the form of hormone replacement and plastic surgery makes this ideal all the more achievable in the modern age. Such men cannot take the role of the masculine by virtue of physical defect, and thus cannot be adequately served by the feminine. They can, however, satisfy the masculine sexually, provided access to the above medical technologies. 6. Masculine women, by contrast, are encouraged to pursue the feminine. The reason for this discrepancy is quite simple: the transgender “man” remains a totally unreachable goal with present medical technology. A fully functioning artificially created penis, equal in every respect to the beauty and virility of the natural variety, is beyond the reach of such women. Until such a technology presents itself, these women must pursue the feminine to the best of their abilities. This point can be summed up in the observation that a fully functioning penis is essential to masculinity in a way that a fully functioning vagina is not to femininity. NB: The classic trope of the “femdom sissy” must be rejected per point 2 and 3, as a sissy is inevitably superior in the rule-bearing quality of strength to the vast majority of women. A compromise can perhaps be fashioned in the slogan “The strong must not submit to the weak, unless a stronger force demands it.” In other words, if it serves the sexual appetite of a strong man for a sissy to submit to a ciswoman, then she must do so. -- source link