forever bitter at marvel for making civil war a captain america movie instead of an avengers mo
forever bitter at marvel for making civil war a captain america movie instead of an avengers moviehow funny! chris evans got 38:15 of screen time and rdj got 37:15 (source), which means that captain america (you know, the main character?) got just one minute more than iron man. i’d argue that cacw is an avengers movie and now we’ll never get a real cap 3“difference in ideals”tf you mean “difference in ideals”. one side was fighting for human rights and the other against. interestingly, all the people on the side of the accords (stark, rhodey, and vision) (not including natasha because she backed out or peter because i honestly don’t think he even knew what he was fighting for or t’challa because he only seemed to be fighting bucky) wouldn’t’ve had all their rights taken away. those with innate powers had to wear tracking bracelets at all times (x), something stark, rhodey, and vision wouldn’t need to worry aboutas opposed to tony who was clearly villainizedwas he, though? given how a lot of folks stans reacted to that movie, i’d say that cap was the one villainized. there’s a lot more team iron man than team cap, is all i’m sayingthe avengers need regulations and accountabilitymaybe so, but the sokovia accords aren’t the way to go! they didn’t actually pass in the un so the avengers should not have been forced to sign, they’re a violation of more than one amendment, a violation of human rights, and do we really want a government in charge of superheroes, especially when we know that hydra was able to infiltrate shield? (x, x, x)cacw could’ve been a perfectly good movie if steve had fought the government directly without the need to paint tony rhodey natasha etcetc as villainsfunny that. for one thing, politicians don’t physically fight. if you wanted to see steve directly fight the government, as in, fight politicians, it wouldn’t have been a superhero movie. it would’ve been two hours of steve et al petitioning, lobbying, etc. for another, he was “directly fighting the government”. stark was on the side of the government -- source link
#long post#anti accords