mikkeneko:jellybeanforest-a-go-go:70slesbian:raging-fan-human:70slesbian:i do care if someone hires
mikkeneko:jellybeanforest-a-go-go:70slesbian:raging-fan-human:70slesbian:i do care if someone hires someone to clean though like you can’t just throw that out there as if it isn’t well known that those people that are hired to clean your home exist because they’re poor. wash your own dirty dishes I understand what you’re saying, but you also seem to be ignoring the fact that people who are hiring these poor people to clean their houses are giving those people jobs. If they weren’t hiring them to clean their houses, these people may not have a job at all.i don’t agree with this logic. i don’t think we need to settle for a job or nothing, is the same to be said for women who work under slavery like conditions in clothing factories in poor countries? why can’t we fight for change instead of accepting that some people just have to be maids Before she moved in to take care of her, my aunt hired a maid to come to my disabled grandmother’s house once a week to clean for like 2-3 hours and paid her $80 every time she came over. There’s no way my grandmother, who had a bum hip from a car accident and hobbled around with her walker (back when she could even walk), could clean her own house. Maids provide an invaluable service, especially for the elderly and disabled, and they shouldn’t be eliminated just because you think their jobs are somehow not good enough for anyone to be doing. Many jobs like housecleaners, gardeners, etc., are great for people who may not speak the local language, who may have had a limited education, or who came here as adults with limited opportunities. My grandfather, who could speak four languages fluently but his English sucked, became a janitor at the age of 58 to support his family when they first came to America, and his kids always advocated that you should treat blue-collar and traditionally low-paid workers with respect because those jobs are valuable and even someone who cleans toilets is a person who is trying their best. Basically, we shouldn’t try to eliminate these jobs; they should just be better compensated.Also I think it would just behoove us, overall, to stop making categories of work that are too disgusting or humiliating to be afforded respect. If it’s respectable to make a living keeping a public space or an office building clean, why is it not respectable to do that same work for a private residence, regardless of whether the person living there is disabled, old, or just really busy? If it’s respectable to cook in a restaurant, why is it not to cook as a private chef? If it’s respectable to do childcare in a kindergarten, why is it not respectable to do so as a nanny or au pair?Do the people in this post set up a similar clamor about how horrifying and degrading farm work is? Because many farm jobs are – but there’s nothing inherently wrong with the work, only with the treatment of the workers. “This work is inherently degrading” is neither useful nor true (and a self-fulfilling prophecy – if you regard the work as degrading, then you will regard the people who do it as degraded.) “These workers need protections and respect” is both.Plus, the sooner we get comfortable with work as work and worthy of respect regardless of your personal feelings about whether you want to do it or not, the sooner we can get protections for sex workers on a solid footing as well. -- source link