alphynix:cartoon-and-animal-lover:alphynix:Almost-Living Fossils Month #11 – The Lost Island Murdere

alphynix:cartoon-and-animal-lover:alphynix:Almost-Living Fossils Month #11 – The Lost Island MurdererThe modern solenodons, today found only on the Caribbean/Antillean islands of Cuba and Hispaniola, represent the last living survivors of a very ancient branch of placental mammals. Although they’re part of the eulipotyphlans – the lineage that also contains shrews, moles, and hedgehogs – their last common ancestor with the other members of that group dates back to over 70 million years ago.And during their early evolutionary history, somewhere between the Late Cretaceous and mid-Eocene (~68-43 mya), the ancestors of the solenodons diverged into two different lineages: the solenodons themselves, and the nesophontids.Known only from skulls and jumbled partial skeletal remains, nesophontids seem to have been fairly similar to their solenodon cousins. They would have been shrew-like in appearance, varying in total size from 5 to 20cm long (2-8″), with slender flexible snouts that they used to sniff out their small invertebrate prey. They also probably had a venomous bite like the solenodons, since their canine teeth had distinctive grooves for injecting toxic saliva.Their remains have been found in various islands around the Caribbean, in Cuba, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, and the Cayman Islands. Between six and twelve different species are represented, all in a single genus called Nesophontes (meaning “island murderer”) – and all of the known specimens are actually subfossils from the Holocene, dating to less than 12,000 years old.These relatively young ages mean that pieces of nesophontid DNA have been successfully recovered from bones within preserved owl pellets, which is how we could confirm their close relationship to solenodons and the dates of their ancestors’ probable divergence. But we have absolutely no idea about the rest of their family history during the entire Cenozoic, such as how and when they originally colonized the Caribbean or whether they had any other extinct relatives in the Americas.(There is one possible partial specimen from a piece of Dominican amber, dating to the Oligocene or Early Miocene, 29-18 million years ago, but it’s not clear whether it’s a nesophontid, a solenodon, or something else entirely.)Nesophontes edithae was the only species of nesophontid living in Puerto Rico and the United States Virgin Islands. It was the largest known member of the genus, at least 20cm long (8″), and may have been able to reach such a size due to the absence of competition from solenodons on those particular islands.Along with its relatives around the Caribbean it seems to have survived frustratingly close to modern times, even existing alongside indigenous humans, with some remains only about 500 years old. But when the islands were colonized by Europeans from the 1490s onwards, the combination of the introduction of invasive Old World rats, new predators like domestic cats and dogs, and extensive deforestation probably killed off the nesophontids very quickly (along with all but two of the solenodon species).Despite claims of fresh-looking remains in owl pellets and searches for surviving populations, there’s currently no convincing evidence for any living nesophontids, and radiocarbon dating has never found anything younger than 500-600 years old. I can’t help but be confused by this sentence.Although they’re part of the eulipotyphlans – the lineage that also contains shrews, moles, and hedgehogs – their last common ancestor with the other members of that group dates back to over 70 million years ago.So, are you saying that eulipotyphlans originated as far back as the Cretaceous? And if that’s the case, then Laurasiatheria, Boreoeutheria, and placentals as a whole are older than we thought?We don’t currently know exactly when the first placentals evolved.The earliest undisputed fossils don’t appear until the start of the Cenozoic, but molecular clock studies disagree and estimate the common placental ancestor instead may have originated as far back as 90-75 ma in the Late Cretaceous.Basically there are three main competing hypotheses for placental origins:“Explosive” – diversification from a single common ancestor in either the very end-Cretaceous or the very earliest Paleocene“Long fuse” – the ancestors of the major placental lineages (Afrotheria/Xenarthra/Boreoeutheria) split off in the Late Cretaceous, but these groups didn’t start diversifying until after the K-Pg extinction“Short fuse” – the ancestors of the major placental lineages all appeared in the Late Cretaceous, and at least some had already started diversifying before the K-Pg extinctionfigure from Springer, M. S. et al (2003). Placental mammal diversification and the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(3), 1056-1061. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0334222100Every now and then a new study finds support for one or the other of these ideas, but it’s probably one of those issues that won’t ever be easily resolved unless we get incredibly lucky and find some new exceptionally good fossils.This is why we still don’t quite know where bats fit in, and have to settle with “as far as we know their closest relatives are all the carnivores and all the hoofed animals” -- source link

More pics about