How about that Lenin? Big reader. Loved books. Tolstoy: loved him. Goncharov: couldn’t get enough of
How about that Lenin? Big reader. Loved books. Tolstoy: loved him. Goncharov: couldn’t get enough of him. Chernyshevsky: the best. But Tariq Ali notes that Lenin couldn’t hang with the avant-garde, and that this had surprising ramifications for the Russian Revolution: “Lenin found it difficult to make any accommodations to modernism in Russia or elsewhere. The work of the artistic avant-garde—Mayakovsky and the Constructivists—was not to his taste. In vain did the poets and artists tell him that they, too, loved Pushkin and Lermontov, but that they were also revolutionaries, challenging old art forms and producing something very different and new that was more in keeping with Bolshevism and the age of revolution. He simply would not budge. They could write and paint whatever they wanted, but why should he be forced to appreciate it? … Shortages of paper during the civil war led to fierce arguments. Should they publish propaganda leaflets or a new poem by Mayakovsky? Lenin insisted on the first option. Lunacharsky was convinced that Mayakovsky’s poem would be far more effective and, on this occasion, he won.”This and more in today’s culture roundup. -- source link
Tumblr Blog : theparisreview.tumblr.com
#literature#literature news#art news#world news#breaking news#todays news#culture news#avantgarde#diction#fecal intensifiers#francis fukuyama#irregardless#lenin#linguistics#novels#russian revolution#shitlessness#words#daily roundup