punkflynn:what the fuck w hat the actua l fguck ok okay there’s a couple of things i need to point o
punkflynn:what the fuck w hat the actua l fguck ok okay there’s a couple of things i need to point out about this picture because i am so fuckgin confused right now you have no idea: 1. his shirt has his own glasses and moustache on it. ok nbd probs a joke or smthn. ok but BUT both the left and the right pictures seem completely identical and his shirt and head have just been swapped ok but how is it that you can see this man’s buckle and belt loops on the right picture where none are seen on the left????? was the man shirtless when the original photo was taken and someone took the time to both photoshop a shirt onto him and then photoshop his face and his shirt around, thus exposing the top of his pants??? but that doesnt make any sense because clearly the expertise of the photoshop on the right is not great enough to photoshop a shirt onto this guy and make it look realistic?????? even the lighting and the colouring of both the photos match the subject and the background???? so what is the real photo here and most importantly why does it exist -- source link