star-allos:“ yeah i think labels cause more problems than they solve. yeah i want to keep comi
star-allos:“ yeah i think labels cause more problems than they solve. yeah i want to keep coming up with more labels to describe myself. we exist” - A good friend of mineHello aspecs who aren’t strictly aro and/or ace! Ever feel alienated by the split between alloromantic-aromantic and allosexual-asexual? Ever feel like you place on the spectrum is a thing all of its own, rather than having to pick a ‘side’? Thought of the non-sam or neu label but found it limiting to omit their sexual and/or romantic orientation?Well, as someone who’s sexuality, no matter how limited, is deeply important to me, and who is tired of swapping between the labels of non-sam, aroallo, and angled aroace, I decided to coin my own terms! Maybe a community will arise from this, because I know I’m not the only one who feels weird about the divide, and who have not found comfort in the terms neu or non-sam, and perhaps dialogue can arise from that.ANYHOW. The flags are all amalgations of the aroace flag by @aroaesflags In place of the orange (community and union) and yellow (forms of love outside of sex and romance) are shades of green for aromantism and purple for asexuality, the multiple shades representing community and diversity among aromantics and asexuals. The middle flag uses shades of grey in place of yellow and orange. The term grey is used for those who find themselves in between a lack of and presence of attraction (greysexual, greyromantic). As the blues represent a combination of asexuality and aromantism, those remain present, as does the white stripe for unity.Aromid - Someone who is strictly aromantic, but not strictly asexual, while still being on the asexual spectrum. Alternatively, someone who is strictly aromantic, but not strictly asexual or allosexual.Amid - Someone who isn’t strictly aromantic or asexual, but on the spectrum of both asexuality and aromantism. Alternatively, someone who is not strictly asexual, aromantic, allosexual, or alloromantic.Acemid - Someone who is strictly asexual, but not strictly aromantic, while still being on the aromantic spectrum. Alternatively, someone who is strictly asexual, but not strictly aromantic or strictly alloromantic.EDIT: Slight additions to the definitions to adhere to different experiences/be more inclusive. I’ve been getting a lot of asks/DMs about it so I want to put it put there: If you want to use these labels for whatever reason, even if they’re not exactly 101% accurate, or you want to use one of these labels over the other despite the other being technically more accurate, you can just. Do it. You don’t need my permission. You don’t need my validation. You don’t need to explain yourself to me. I’m not about label policing. If it helps you better understand yourself or you resonate with it just. Go for it, y'know? These might be labels I coined, but they don’t belong to me. You don’t need to ask my permission to use them. They’re for anyone who resonates with them, even if for reasons I don’t understand. -- source link
#terminology