circumcisiondad: thewillguy:circ-nation:I really am proud to be cut. Circumcision isn’t ju
circumcisiondad: thewillguy: circ-nation: I really am proud to be cut. Circumcision isn’t just about hygiene and health; it’s tribal. It’s masculine sexuality at its most raw and mysterious level. Much of its power is due to society’s blushed silence when confronted by this ritual which we beg for and cum for, yet hesitate to discuss. Statistics consistently prove that American women prefer it, mothers demand it, fathers fight for it, and men identify with it–and mock those who lack it. And yet we lack any spoken reasons for doing it. For most of us, no religious imperative demands it (Christians, historically, typically don’t circumcise…hence uncircumcised Europe) and arguments from hygiene are sketchy at best. No God or medical establishment drives our lust for circumcised cock…it is a deeper, tribal desire…a survival of very old ways of initiation, tribal identity, phallic obsession and animal lust pulsating at the heart of American society under a thin veneer of pseudo-civilization. The circumcised cock, shorn of the vestiges of a clitoral hood, becomes utterly masculine, the semblance of a perpetually erect phallus. The Ancient Greeks found Jewish circumcised penises obscene–not because of the procedure, but because it made their penises look permanently aroused, since the bared glans is only visible during arousal among the uncircumcised. And so, on a very deep level, the circumcised cock with its bared head is an image of radical, perpetual arousal. The ultimate symbol of male sexuality. This could not be better said and, I believe, strikes at the mysterious heart of why circumcision is done (and why we can’t or won’t speak of it explicitly). I’m not sure I like the fervour with which this is talked about but I do like the acknowledgement that it’s bigger than just my decision. Sure, I get to say yes or no, but I also have to decide to honour generations of culture. Cut pride -- source link